John Dee's Almanac

John Dee's Almanac

Share this post

John Dee's Almanac
John Dee's Almanac
COVID vs. COVID (part 3)

COVID vs. COVID (part 3)

Predictive models for the incidence of COVID-19 amongst adult in-hospital deaths are used to assess diagnostic bias in the EPR of an unknown NHS Trust

John Dee's avatar
John Dee
Aug 28, 2023
∙ Paid
29

Share this post

John Dee's Almanac
John Dee's Almanac
COVID vs. COVID (part 3)
5
Share

In part 2 of this series I stumbled upon a tasty finding, this being a substantial mismatch between incidence of observed and predicted COVID-19 diagnoses for the first 10 weeks of 2021 as vaccination got into its stride. If we assume that the machine learning technique employed (multilayer perceptron) has done a decent job of predicting the likelihood of a COVID diagnosis from a matrix of symptoms then we need to ask why this 10-week period is characterised by a substantial surplus of diagnoses declared in the EPR for 19,457 deceased in-patients. Thorny questions we might ask include:

  • Was the PCR cycle threshold cranked up to yield a bevy of false positives?

  • Was the mRNA vaccine inducing false positive test results?

  • Was the mRNA vaccine resulting in COVID-like illness?

  • Was the mRNA vaccine wrecking natural immunity?

But we could equally ask if machine learning has produced numerical garbage! I decided to rule this possibility out by repeating the exercise using classic multivariate logist…

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 John Dee
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share