Iatrogenesis
Just how many people did COVID actually and truthfully kill?
Get to know this word and what it means because this is where the revelations are going next, and it won't be pretty.
Back on 25th March 2021 I first used the word when I wrote:
I don’t know about you folks but I’m getting an uneasy feeling that all these exploratory trials designed to test a raft of drug therapies to combat COVID-19 may have generated iatrogenic death on an unprecedented scale via high dose and cumulative toxicity leading to liver failure, sudden cardiac death and multi-organ failure.
This was a comment on the SOLIDARITY, DISCOVERY, RECOVERY, and REMAP drug trials in which incarcerated COVID patients became guinea pigs for a raft of experimental drugs.
Since then I've used the word 'iatrogenic' 13 times in various posts, which is not a good sign. In a nutshell, It means that a number folk likely died because of medical care, and in this we must include death due to lockdown and other policies as well as closure of health services.
A diabolical example of this is the inexplicable peak in non-COVID care home deaths back in spring 2020; a peak that hasn't been matched since, and a peak that coincided with evacuation of the frail and elderly from hospital beds, leading to judicious use of end-of-life care pathways (I shall be revising this analysis shortly):
Several times since early 2021 I have questioned whether SARS-COV-2 could be considered as deadly as claimed and, on a couple of occasions, whether there was a virus circulating at all! This wasn't the result of me wearing foil headgear but basic questioning of the narrative as a consequence of analyses that simply didn't add up.
Jonathan Engler of HART fame has his sleeves rolled up on this topic and you may find these two articles a good introduction as to where he’s at:
The dude Joel Smalley is similarly on a real roll with this, with the following two recent articles giving it both barrels and then some:
Did the COVID Virus Kill Anyone?
Iatrogenesis in England & Wales
Meanwhile back on the ranch yours truly is trying to find the 20 - 40 seriously quiet hours he needs to nail an iatrogenic harm model; that is, a statistical model that examines the harmful impact of policies, drugs and genetic therapies against a background of respiratory seasonality and incomplete processing of young deaths by the ONS (likely due to delays at the coroner’s end - young folk are not supposed to die).
BTW don’t confuse iatrogenic death with murder! We’re not talking about health professionals bumping people off to meet WEF targets. We’re talking about mistakes, errors of judgement, sloppiness, misdiagnosis, oversight, lack of care, inappropriate protocols and that sort of thing. Often it isn’t an individual at fault but the system of healthcare, which will include systems of patient management that should have been revised or dumped. Much of this can be avoided by regular critical review, which means challenging the status quo, going up against lead clinicians/managers, being open, being flexible and questioning policies across the range of disciplines.
This is some darn strange retirement.
Kettle On!
Thank you for this John, you may recall this and associated factors are something that’s concerned me. I agree that these deaths weren’t the result of murdering people, although in some instances it came very close to the definition. I hope you’ll be looking into the widespread use of DNRs and certain drugs that resulted in so many deaths. I have difficulty in accepting it was confusion that led so many doctors across the country to issue blanket DNRs.
I updated the figures yesterday and see that the Non Covid deaths in private homes since January 2020 to week 46 of 2022 is 98,561. Yet nothing from government, media and medical authorities.
I wondered if you were planning to give evidence to the Covid-19 Inquiry. The Inquiry Team seems rather underpowered from a statistical perspective. Perhaps that was deliberate.