7 Comments
May 27·edited May 27

Some ideas:

1. Maybe do the same things you did in parts 2 and 3 (i.e. look for disproportionately of occurrence around covid time), but do it brute-force across all diagnoses and all treatments (or at least the most common ones). In other words, don't assume what covid looks like a priori, but see if something can imply what covid looks like. I doubt going by code groupings would work for this, as opposed to isolated codes.

2. In the above, see if all the presumable negative controls (e.g. laceration) don't proportionally spike around covid.

3. Make a group of diagnoses composed of the highest hits from the above (i.e cherry pick) and see if it's proportionality is totally nonsensical or not.

4. Look at rates of death and hospitalization for every diagnosis. See how those rates changed around covid.

I would posit that a simultaneous spike in both proportionately and in fatality rate (or admission rate) of a given diagnosis could indicate covid. Maybe this could form a code grouping as well.

Expand full comment
author
May 27·edited May 27Author

Great ideas... already analysed and coming up in parts 5 through 7 that are ready to roll! Parts 8 - 10 along the same lines are in prep.

Expand full comment

sublime come sempre !!!!♥

Expand full comment
author
May 27·edited May 27Author

Thank you! It occurred to me that the vast majority of readers will get their idea of A&E from TV drama, and it is upon this distorted image that the government nudge department preyed. Working in A&E gives an entirely different perspective, for example, seeing someone in scrubs hurrying down a corridor usually meant that somebody had brought in a cake.

Expand full comment

Had to look up the meaning but agree!

Expand full comment

Please hook me up with comps to Private Passion and Climate Corner. First six = aubuch

Expand full comment
author

Comps are on their way!

Expand full comment