- I can't remember if we've already been over this, but there are a few references on chronic covid being detected.
- Eugyppius wrote about this book too some months back.
- The pattern of covid spiking everywhere with vaccine rollout could hypothetically be a mass reactivation. I suppose even a mass infection. Not that I believe either.
- Some new live vaccine in the last several years? Either the live virus, or else an "adventitious" virus contaminant? In 1918 era as well?
John Dee my mother had Asian flu as a teenager, she said she thought her head was going to explode and has never had anything like it since.
While she’s had the flu virus since and been ill, she says she’s never experienced been anywhere near as bad as the Asian flu, her immune system has kept that memory from her being 15 to now 81.
Nature and the human body is amazing, no matter how much they pretend, they still don’t fully understand how complex in how it works.
As a data man have a pop onto the governments website, they’ve slid the digital ID rollout consultation on there.
Makes an interesting read considering data breaches and cyber attacks are so common, I mean what could go possibly wrong!!!
I contracted, what I now has been called Russian Flu in 1977 I was proper poorly for 9 weeks, in bed poorly! Interesting it was deemed to be an escapee from a lab 😳
Your work, John, is extremely revealing and I believe those who argue against the validity of the sciences of virology and vaccinology would find it useful in support of their arguments - I will pass it on.
Perhaps we should suspect that the Spanish flu figure is simply too anomalous to reflect a flu event and the sickness and death from the alleged flu has other causes. As the evidence shows that the alleged pandemic and excess deaths are the result of a variety of things, eg, invalid test and fraudulent non-diagnostic case-determination, inappropriate discharge of the elderly in hospitals to care homes, overuse of opioids, aggressive drug trials, inappropriate use of ventilators, etc why not for previous events? There is no way on earth this fake pandemic is their first BBQ.
If you search on a less-biased search engine such as peekier.com for spanish flu and other words such as "hoax" "bacterial pneumonia" and "vaccination", you'll get a number of responses ... after you wade through a few mainstream sources denying the "conspiracy theories" that it wasn't as reported.
The reason modern technology has not been able to pinpoint the killer influenza strain from this pandemic is because influenza was not the killer.
More soldiers died during WWI from disease than from bullets.
The pandemic was not flu. An estimated 95% (or higher) of the deaths were caused by bacterial pneumonia, not influenza/a virus.
The pandemic was not Spanish. The first cases of bacterial pneumonia in 1918 trace back to a military base in Fort Riley, Kansas.
From January 21 – June 4, 1918, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley.
During the remainder of 1918 as those soldiers – often living and traveling under poor sanitary conditions – were sent to Europe to fight, they spread bacteria at every stop between Kansas and the frontline trenches in France.
One study describes soldiers “with active infections (who) were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their noses and throats, while others—often, in the same “breathing spaces”—were profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs by their own or others’ colonizing bacteria.” (1)
The “Spanish Flu” attacked healthy people in their prime. Bacterial pneumonia attacks people in their prime. Flu attacks the young, old and immunocompromised.
When WW1 ended on November 11, 1918, soldiers returned to their home countries and colonial outposts, spreading the killer bacterial pneumonia worldwide.
During WW1, the Rockefeller Institute also sent the antimeningococcic serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries, helping spread the epidemic worldwide.
During the pandemic of 1918-19, the so-called “Spanish Flu” killed 50-100 million people, including many soldiers.
Many people do not realize that disease killed far more soldiers on all sides than machine guns or mustard gas or anything else typically associated with WWI.
Author claims flu was due to vaccination - interesting to note that both Wuhan and Bergamo were highly-vaccinated cities (flu and other vaccines - can't find source at the moment) just prior to the covid pandemic taking over the world.
Interestingly, this mainstream article also claims that the cause of sickness and death was bacterial pneumonia but that it was "secondary bacterial pneumonia—not the influenza virus by itself —that killed most of the millions who perished in the 1918 flu pandemic".
Gosh, now that's quite a serving of information! Only last night I read about yet another well known outbreak starting within the military and wondered if this was another 'experiment'.
Another aspect of the Spanish flu is the role of aspirin. Heavy-handed use caused capillary damage, with folk bleeding internally, offering a breeding ground for bacterial pneumonia.
Oh yes I forgot reading about overuse of aspirin but didn't read or didn't comprehend that it caused a breeding ground for bacterial pneumonia just that it killed people - reminiscent of high-dosage remdesivir and HCQ, no? https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091002132346.htm.
So mainstream admits "bacterial pneumonia" but says it was secondary to flu and aspirin "made it [the flu] worse". Of course, if you're already suffering from bacterial pneumonia and you're given high doses of aspirin ...
This article, Cough and Awe - SARS by any other name, provides an excellent analysis of the alleged 2003 SARS pandemic by UK health writer, Steven Ransom, who unfortunately I can find little trace of apart from this article - I've republished it on my substack as it doesn't look great on the original page. He says he appeared on a BBC radio programme opposite a professor of bacteriology whose form of engagement was to trot out the dogma and brook no argument - sound familiar? This article is a must-read to get a sense of how this alleged pandemic is just a rinse and repeat, oh my goodness is it a rinse and repeat.
"After a detective hunt across China, researchers chasing the origin of the deadly SARS virus have finally found their smoking gun. In a remote cave in Yunnan province, virologists have identified a single population of horseshoe bats that harbours virus strains with all the genetic building blocks of the one that jumped to humans in 2002, killing almost 800 people around the world.
The killer strain could easily have arisen from such a bat population, the researchers report in PLoS Pathogens1 on 30 November. They warn that the ingredients are in place for a similar disease to emerge again."
Well, high dose aspirin causes micro damage and bleeding, especially within the delicate tissues of the lung with bacteria just loving those conditions. There's a couple of excellent papers on this that I've gone and misplaced. I'm not convinced about all these 'jumping' theories but don't have time to dig really deep. One thing I'm noting as I read Hope-Simpson's book is complete reliance on isolates for viral sequencing. An 'isolate' is not the same thing as a purified, isolated virus, being a veritable soup of specimen garbage. This is not unlike tasseography!
Yes, I knew there was no virus from Day One but that was only from a psyop point of view. In psyops they do what they want for real and fake the rest and it was obvious they only wanted us to believe in a virus they didn't want one for real and even judging by a conventional understanding of viruses (what I had at the start) I knew a real virus wouldn't work for their narrative - starting in Wuhan and jumping over to Bergamo ... but then when I started seeing that scientists were saying that NO virus had ever been proven to exist, I was like, really? So much medical fraud I had absolutely no idea about ... HIV not proven to cause AIDS and HIV itself not proven and Dr Stefan Lanka with his challenge for anyone to show the measles virus has been isolated and so on. It took awhile to get my head around I have to say.
Absolutely blooming amazing, with links to historic events. Just help me understand...."Those with beady eyes will note the disparity between observed and predicted mortality for the COVID years of 2020 and 2021. I do not see a disparity of observed and predicted but a sudden drop of both observed and predicted 2020/2021. Maybe I miss something. Thanks.
Why thank you, kind sir! It's a shame I can't post an image in the comments section, but if you get a magnifying glass you'll see the red line suddenly dip below the green beyond 2018 in the final slide.
- Covid's earliest claimed detection seems to now be March 2019:
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/earliest-known-novel-coronavirus-detected-in-barcelona/1891441
- I can't remember if we've already been over this, but there are a few references on chronic covid being detected.
- Eugyppius wrote about this book too some months back.
- The pattern of covid spiking everywhere with vaccine rollout could hypothetically be a mass reactivation. I suppose even a mass infection. Not that I believe either.
- Some new live vaccine in the last several years? Either the live virus, or else an "adventitious" virus contaminant? In 1918 era as well?
Aha! Merci beaucoup!
John Dee my mother had Asian flu as a teenager, she said she thought her head was going to explode and has never had anything like it since.
While she’s had the flu virus since and been ill, she says she’s never experienced been anywhere near as bad as the Asian flu, her immune system has kept that memory from her being 15 to now 81.
Nature and the human body is amazing, no matter how much they pretend, they still don’t fully understand how complex in how it works.
As a data man have a pop onto the governments website, they’ve slid the digital ID rollout consultation on there.
Makes an interesting read considering data breaches and cyber attacks are so common, I mean what could go possibly wrong!!!
Interesting! The more I dig into this topic the less it makes sense. I thought climate change was poorly shod but virology takes the biscuit!
I contracted, what I now has been called Russian Flu in 1977 I was proper poorly for 9 weeks, in bed poorly! Interesting it was deemed to be an escapee from a lab 😳
Yes, that raised an eyebrow!
Your work, John, is extremely revealing and I believe those who argue against the validity of the sciences of virology and vaccinology would find it useful in support of their arguments - I will pass it on.
Perhaps we should suspect that the Spanish flu figure is simply too anomalous to reflect a flu event and the sickness and death from the alleged flu has other causes. As the evidence shows that the alleged pandemic and excess deaths are the result of a variety of things, eg, invalid test and fraudulent non-diagnostic case-determination, inappropriate discharge of the elderly in hospitals to care homes, overuse of opioids, aggressive drug trials, inappropriate use of ventilators, etc why not for previous events? There is no way on earth this fake pandemic is their first BBQ.
If you search on a less-biased search engine such as peekier.com for spanish flu and other words such as "hoax" "bacterial pneumonia" and "vaccination", you'll get a number of responses ... after you wade through a few mainstream sources denying the "conspiracy theories" that it wasn't as reported.
https://themillenniumreport.com/2018/11/spanish-flu-of-1918-was-really-a-bioterror-attack-on-humanity/
Summary
The reason modern technology has not been able to pinpoint the killer influenza strain from this pandemic is because influenza was not the killer.
More soldiers died during WWI from disease than from bullets.
The pandemic was not flu. An estimated 95% (or higher) of the deaths were caused by bacterial pneumonia, not influenza/a virus.
The pandemic was not Spanish. The first cases of bacterial pneumonia in 1918 trace back to a military base in Fort Riley, Kansas.
From January 21 – June 4, 1918, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley.
During the remainder of 1918 as those soldiers – often living and traveling under poor sanitary conditions – were sent to Europe to fight, they spread bacteria at every stop between Kansas and the frontline trenches in France.
One study describes soldiers “with active infections (who) were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their noses and throats, while others—often, in the same “breathing spaces”—were profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs by their own or others’ colonizing bacteria.” (1)
The “Spanish Flu” attacked healthy people in their prime. Bacterial pneumonia attacks people in their prime. Flu attacks the young, old and immunocompromised.
When WW1 ended on November 11, 1918, soldiers returned to their home countries and colonial outposts, spreading the killer bacterial pneumonia worldwide.
During WW1, the Rockefeller Institute also sent the antimeningococcic serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries, helping spread the epidemic worldwide.
During the pandemic of 1918-19, the so-called “Spanish Flu” killed 50-100 million people, including many soldiers.
Many people do not realize that disease killed far more soldiers on all sides than machine guns or mustard gas or anything else typically associated with WWI.
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/spanish_flu.htm
Author claims flu was due to vaccination - interesting to note that both Wuhan and Bergamo were highly-vaccinated cities (flu and other vaccines - can't find source at the moment) just prior to the covid pandemic taking over the world.
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/influenza-vaccines/study-bacterial-pneumonia-was-main-killer-1918-flu-pandemic
Interestingly, this mainstream article also claims that the cause of sickness and death was bacterial pneumonia but that it was "secondary bacterial pneumonia—not the influenza virus by itself —that killed most of the millions who perished in the 1918 flu pandemic".
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/secrets-of-influenza-%F0%9F%98%B7:1
A 15-minute talk, The Secrets of Influenza, by MD, Sam Bailey, which looks at contagion experiments done during the time of the Spanish flu
Gosh, now that's quite a serving of information! Only last night I read about yet another well known outbreak starting within the military and wondered if this was another 'experiment'.
Another aspect of the Spanish flu is the role of aspirin. Heavy-handed use caused capillary damage, with folk bleeding internally, offering a breeding ground for bacterial pneumonia.
Oh yes I forgot reading about overuse of aspirin but didn't read or didn't comprehend that it caused a breeding ground for bacterial pneumonia just that it killed people - reminiscent of high-dosage remdesivir and HCQ, no? https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091002132346.htm.
So mainstream admits "bacterial pneumonia" but says it was secondary to flu and aspirin "made it [the flu] worse". Of course, if you're already suffering from bacterial pneumonia and you're given high doses of aspirin ...
This article, Cough and Awe - SARS by any other name, provides an excellent analysis of the alleged 2003 SARS pandemic by UK health writer, Steven Ransom, who unfortunately I can find little trace of apart from this article - I've republished it on my substack as it doesn't look great on the original page. He says he appeared on a BBC radio programme opposite a professor of bacteriology whose form of engagement was to trot out the dogma and brook no argument - sound familiar? This article is a must-read to get a sense of how this alleged pandemic is just a rinse and repeat, oh my goodness is it a rinse and repeat.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/covid-19-a-sars-1-rinse-and-repeat
And this is a 15m video by Dr Sam Bailey on SARS-1.
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/what-happened-to-sars-1:8
I quote from an article she references in Nature. Credibility 1-10?
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-017-07766-9
"After a detective hunt across China, researchers chasing the origin of the deadly SARS virus have finally found their smoking gun. In a remote cave in Yunnan province, virologists have identified a single population of horseshoe bats that harbours virus strains with all the genetic building blocks of the one that jumped to humans in 2002, killing almost 800 people around the world.
The killer strain could easily have arisen from such a bat population, the researchers report in PLoS Pathogens1 on 30 November. They warn that the ingredients are in place for a similar disease to emerge again."
Well, high dose aspirin causes micro damage and bleeding, especially within the delicate tissues of the lung with bacteria just loving those conditions. There's a couple of excellent papers on this that I've gone and misplaced. I'm not convinced about all these 'jumping' theories but don't have time to dig really deep. One thing I'm noting as I read Hope-Simpson's book is complete reliance on isolates for viral sequencing. An 'isolate' is not the same thing as a purified, isolated virus, being a veritable soup of specimen garbage. This is not unlike tasseography!
Had to look it up ... and had a chuckle when I did. What an apt analogy!
Yes, Team No Virus is out there trying to get people to see that virology is all smoke'n'mirrors with its re-definition of the word isolation.
https://lawfulrebel.com/team-no-virus/
LOL - I thought that would tickle! The more I read up on virology the more the entire field stinks, and at a very basic level.
Yes, I knew there was no virus from Day One but that was only from a psyop point of view. In psyops they do what they want for real and fake the rest and it was obvious they only wanted us to believe in a virus they didn't want one for real and even judging by a conventional understanding of viruses (what I had at the start) I knew a real virus wouldn't work for their narrative - starting in Wuhan and jumping over to Bergamo ... but then when I started seeing that scientists were saying that NO virus had ever been proven to exist, I was like, really? So much medical fraud I had absolutely no idea about ... HIV not proven to cause AIDS and HIV itself not proven and Dr Stefan Lanka with his challenge for anyone to show the measles virus has been isolated and so on. It took awhile to get my head around I have to say.
Absolutely blooming amazing, with links to historic events. Just help me understand...."Those with beady eyes will note the disparity between observed and predicted mortality for the COVID years of 2020 and 2021. I do not see a disparity of observed and predicted but a sudden drop of both observed and predicted 2020/2021. Maybe I miss something. Thanks.
Why thank you, kind sir! It's a shame I can't post an image in the comments section, but if you get a magnifying glass you'll see the red line suddenly dip below the green beyond 2018 in the final slide.