Yes, it could be something quirky with very young kids but this analysis kicked off with 15 - 19y olds, and those cupboards were there before rollout. In the next few articles you'll see a consistent pattern over all age groups. When it comes to death excluding outliers is a dangerous tactic. If we're measuring sea level then we'd expect to throw out erroneous/misleading bouy readings but deaths are never erroneous.
- I don't know if it's possible to do pre and post school closures in the youngest. Totally tangential suggestion. Sorry I did not spell that out clearly.
- You might nonetheless do the super young kids pre and post vax rollout as a negative control, as they did not have vaccines available to them.
Rolling this out on the young who have never been at risk is nothing less than callous. I have two teenagers who were willing to get this junk until I told them no way, not only was there no long term data available the trials run until 2023, so you are taking part in an uncontrolled, monitored and unpaid trial with absolutely no comeback if, when anything goes wrong. They didn’t even have the decency to inform people of the correct potential masses of side effects that could happen.
We’ve seen a complete derelict of duty from not only the government, all medical governing bodies who have done nothing to protect the public from the medical tyranny and lies that has gone on.
Vaccine hesitancy is at a all time high, millions did not have a problem before will never touch another shot of anything and I for one do not blame them, the MRHA has ok’d the fast track of gene therapy to be constantly rolled out. What we’ve witnessed is the fox( pharma) let loose in the chicken run with parliaments full approval, we’ve already started to be inundated with wonderful new drugs and treatments which I personally wouldn’t touch without digging deep into all research and data available.
My youngest went and did some research digging on the covid jabs while I was at work, they then told me they would not be getting any of them.
Both my children told me I was correct to not let them have it as the news filtered out that it didn’t stop transmission as they promoted or infection. They were willing to go with the flow because they were told it was the right thing to do, rather than what was the right thing for them. This last two years has been a valuable lesson in ignoring the manipulation techniques and standing your ground on what’s right for you.
You must be very proud of your children. Mine are too young to be doing their own research but i do hope they display the same level of critical thinking when the time comes ❤️
Yes indeed, though see my mini series starting with 'Counting Deaths (part 1)' whereby I compare DOR with DOD. This isn't as much of an issue as folk make out providing you handle registration spikes. Given I'm using DOR counts against DOR counts then this becomes even less of an issue. I may invest in a pile of DOD data at some point if the ball I got rolling today rolls well.
The biggest issue of all is delays to processing, with officers indicating to me that it's taking 6 months for both DOR and DOD figures to appear reasonably complete since rollout, i.e. there's a lot more death to come!
Another shiny one John, however what dates have you used for pre and post vaccine ? Do you need 3 colours, pre vaccine, post vaccine all ages (Dec 2020) and post 15-19y vaccines ( late 2021 ) ?
In my database the vaccine era kicks off in 2020/w50. Yes indeed, I could colour code the slideinto vax phases, but that would prempt tomorrow's offering!
I’m so relieved UsForThem challenged the MRHA about child vaccines. When you think that not all 15-19yos had the vaccine we could be looking at xs deaths in children being similar to the xs group life claims. 😱😭
If you believe the government figures which is a big if, according to them around half that age bracket took the jabs. The friends of my children who took them still caught it, a totally pointless exercise tried out on them of all risk and no benefit. Some were just so they could go on holiday, as a parent they should know better than going along just because others are.
I explained to my two it was my job as a parent to protect them, my other half who is incidentally a scientist didn’t do an ounce or research and bought the whole kit ‘n’ kaboodle refusing point blank to look or read anything I had to offer. He’s now like millions of others burying their heads in the sand that nothings wrong pretending these excess deaths and vaccine harm doesn’t exist.
The I’m alright Jacks need to hang their heads in shame dismissing and discarding peoples suffering. Both my mum and uncle now suffer with a rash after getting their third jab, like millions of others it’s not logged onto the yellow card system they didn’t know existed until I told them about it.
A friend has had to close her business down as she can no longer work, she’s suffered and struggled with horrendous migraines and heart palpitations since her second jab. She doesn’t qualify for the government’s 60% plus disability injury scheme and says no one is interested in the damage that they cause. She told me while she was in the queue to get her second jab, which caused her problems she was thinking this doesn’t feel right and she wished she listened to her instincts and walked away.
We need to fight for the truth to be out for these people, they are victims of misinformation and propaganda, ultimately we need to make sure it never happens again.
- If you found clustering in super young children, that would likely be accidental poisoning getting in cupboards at home.
- I wonder if you need to exclude some outliers in these calculations.
Yes, it could be something quirky with very young kids but this analysis kicked off with 15 - 19y olds, and those cupboards were there before rollout. In the next few articles you'll see a consistent pattern over all age groups. When it comes to death excluding outliers is a dangerous tactic. If we're measuring sea level then we'd expect to throw out erroneous/misleading bouy readings but deaths are never erroneous.
- I don't know if it's possible to do pre and post school closures in the youngest. Totally tangential suggestion. Sorry I did not spell that out clearly.
- You might nonetheless do the super young kids pre and post vax rollout as a negative control, as they did not have vaccines available to them.
What a cracking suggestion! I shall scribble this in my big black book. However, a confounding factor would be breast feeding.
Rolling this out on the young who have never been at risk is nothing less than callous. I have two teenagers who were willing to get this junk until I told them no way, not only was there no long term data available the trials run until 2023, so you are taking part in an uncontrolled, monitored and unpaid trial with absolutely no comeback if, when anything goes wrong. They didn’t even have the decency to inform people of the correct potential masses of side effects that could happen.
We’ve seen a complete derelict of duty from not only the government, all medical governing bodies who have done nothing to protect the public from the medical tyranny and lies that has gone on.
Vaccine hesitancy is at a all time high, millions did not have a problem before will never touch another shot of anything and I for one do not blame them, the MRHA has ok’d the fast track of gene therapy to be constantly rolled out. What we’ve witnessed is the fox( pharma) let loose in the chicken run with parliaments full approval, we’ve already started to be inundated with wonderful new drugs and treatments which I personally wouldn’t touch without digging deep into all research and data available.
My youngest went and did some research digging on the covid jabs while I was at work, they then told me they would not be getting any of them.
Both my children told me I was correct to not let them have it as the news filtered out that it didn’t stop transmission as they promoted or infection. They were willing to go with the flow because they were told it was the right thing to do, rather than what was the right thing for them. This last two years has been a valuable lesson in ignoring the manipulation techniques and standing your ground on what’s right for you.
You must be very proud of your children. Mine are too young to be doing their own research but i do hope they display the same level of critical thinking when the time comes ❤️
All based on date of registration rather than date of death I presume?
Yes indeed, though see my mini series starting with 'Counting Deaths (part 1)' whereby I compare DOR with DOD. This isn't as much of an issue as folk make out providing you handle registration spikes. Given I'm using DOR counts against DOR counts then this becomes even less of an issue. I may invest in a pile of DOD data at some point if the ball I got rolling today rolls well.
The biggest issue of all is delays to processing, with officers indicating to me that it's taking 6 months for both DOR and DOD figures to appear reasonably complete since rollout, i.e. there's a lot more death to come!
https://jdee.substack.com/p/counting-deaths-part-1
The dude that is Joel Smalley has paid for an update to his DOD FOI request - I'll be grabbing this after breakfast and re-running the analyses.
I guess you don’t have the data to show similar plots pre-covid? Another thought - what does the plot look like by month/quarter/season?
I've got weekly banded data going back to 2010 but not not quinary age band - that's something I'd need to pay for under FOI.
I'd be willing to chip in to get this data. It seems like it would be useful for checking the analysis.
Cheers! If the analysis pans out well then it would be worth ordering some DOD data in - I've already got the go ahead from the ONS.
Joel Smalley has paid for an update to his FOI DOD request - I will be grabbing this after breakfast.
Another shiny one John, however what dates have you used for pre and post vaccine ? Do you need 3 colours, pre vaccine, post vaccine all ages (Dec 2020) and post 15-19y vaccines ( late 2021 ) ?
In my database the vaccine era kicks off in 2020/w50. Yes indeed, I could colour code the slideinto vax phases, but that would prempt tomorrow's offering!
Whoops, sorry I'll keep my mush shut 🤪 🤣🤣
LOL!
I’m so relieved UsForThem challenged the MRHA about child vaccines. When you think that not all 15-19yos had the vaccine we could be looking at xs deaths in children being similar to the xs group life claims. 😱😭
If you believe the government figures which is a big if, according to them around half that age bracket took the jabs. The friends of my children who took them still caught it, a totally pointless exercise tried out on them of all risk and no benefit. Some were just so they could go on holiday, as a parent they should know better than going along just because others are.
I explained to my two it was my job as a parent to protect them, my other half who is incidentally a scientist didn’t do an ounce or research and bought the whole kit ‘n’ kaboodle refusing point blank to look or read anything I had to offer. He’s now like millions of others burying their heads in the sand that nothings wrong pretending these excess deaths and vaccine harm doesn’t exist.
The I’m alright Jacks need to hang their heads in shame dismissing and discarding peoples suffering. Both my mum and uncle now suffer with a rash after getting their third jab, like millions of others it’s not logged onto the yellow card system they didn’t know existed until I told them about it.
A friend has had to close her business down as she can no longer work, she’s suffered and struggled with horrendous migraines and heart palpitations since her second jab. She doesn’t qualify for the government’s 60% plus disability injury scheme and says no one is interested in the damage that they cause. She told me while she was in the queue to get her second jab, which caused her problems she was thinking this doesn’t feel right and she wished she listened to her instincts and walked away.
We need to fight for the truth to be out for these people, they are victims of misinformation and propaganda, ultimately we need to make sure it never happens again.