Thank you for the praise! I am going to return it soon. My current analysis of all cause mortality showed that even April 2020 was not that much of a stand out month when looking back properly over the last 600. Yes, 50 years! I was going to reinforce the point that at least 50% was not even COVID but, according to this piece, I can now confidently say it was a mere 0.4% to 28%?!
Would be great to see the main nuggets of your posts over the last few years distilled into a single long post or an academic paper -- if you can find the time and sufficient hot water.
Dear John, you kindly said I could have a 2 for 1 subscription to include your Climate Corner substack. However the system hasn't recognised this and tells me I'm not a subscriber. I guess you have to do something administrative. Thanks, Ross
We know now, also, that spike was produced throughout the body for some time after the mRNA shots, so it also seems likely that post-vaccination effects also resulted in many test positives that were picking up jab-induced spike rather than Covid-induced spike (particularly for antigen/LFT tests b/c they were based specifically on spike in most cases).
Darn - a critical typo! That 18% figure should be 28% - the tables are correct but my fingers are clumsy. The online version has been revised.
Yep. COVID was almost a non-issue in 2020. The pandemic had to be orchestrated by a multitude of measures.
In 2021, it turned into an actual threat due to the impact of "vaccines" on immunity.
Children started dying.
Pregnant women started dying.
Other healthy people started dying.
The proportion of ICU patients among hospitalized COVID inpatients increased.
The proportion of pneumonia among COVID inpatients increased.
Critics were still busy trying to prove that "there is no COVID".
Thank you for the praise! I am going to return it soon. My current analysis of all cause mortality showed that even April 2020 was not that much of a stand out month when looking back properly over the last 600. Yes, 50 years! I was going to reinforce the point that at least 50% was not even COVID but, according to this piece, I can now confidently say it was a mere 0.4% to 28%?!
It’s the “viral” Plandemic that keeps on giving. Great article once again.
Innit just? I've handled some lousy data in my time but pandemic data - any and all of it - takes the biscuit!
Would be great to see the main nuggets of your posts over the last few years distilled into a single long post or an academic paper -- if you can find the time and sufficient hot water.
Dear John, you kindly said I could have a 2 for 1 subscription to include your Climate Corner substack. However the system hasn't recognised this and tells me I'm not a subscriber. I guess you have to do something administrative. Thanks, Ross
I'll need to fiddle - hang on...
Sorted!
Thanks JD!
Thanks John, keep up the good work. In terms of the jab side effects manifesting as "covid," Canas et al 2021 looked at this specifically and concluded, based on a machine learning model, that the side effects and Covid were indistinguishable: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370%2821%2900493-4/fulltext.
We know now, also, that spike was produced throughout the body for some time after the mRNA shots, so it also seems likely that post-vaccination effects also resulted in many test positives that were picking up jab-induced spike rather than Covid-induced spike (particularly for antigen/LFT tests b/c they were based specifically on spike in most cases).
My feeling is that probably much of the "omicron wave" was in fact jab-induced rather than actually Covid.
This post has been revised to accommodate my broader definition of symptomatic COVID!