I put down my engineer’s spectral spanner and pick up vaccine records to discover the magical elixir has done nothing to alleviate incidence of symptomatic COVID amongst 3,412 in-hospital deaths
I tend to click on the like button on the email so that the article opens separately and I can see any changes. I recommend this method to everyone! Yes, because it ratchets up the like count!! "WERGH"? I don't know this term. I will be quoting you again this week!
‘Wergh’ first appears in a John Dee Climate Normal article on 5 Sep 2022 entitled 'The Temperature Of The UK Over The Last 100 years (part 2)'. I liked it so much I used it again on 14 Sep 2022 in 'Vaccines & Death (part 9)', then again on 10 Jul 2023 in 'Do COVID Vaccines Work (part 11)' when the phrase ‘the word is wergh’ was born. In any given analysis of pretty much anything these days WTF and WTAF often surface and wergh (often expressed as WERGH!) graciously takes us past the point of raw incredulity into the realm of the truly surreal.
I don't think anything can be said based on the blue line not getting down after vaccines. If it could they wouldn't be doing test-negative studies. What makes more sense to me is this: Look at (symptomatic covid deaths)/(all-cause deaths) both pre and post vaccine. Kind of like a proportional reporting ratio.
I started out crunching the proportion of COVID to all cause death but stopped - I shall recommence turning the handle on this after some tea and toast and shall publish the results in part 7.
Ah the Mann Whitney U Test takes me back. Can’t remember what I was supposed to do with it but it was a cool name I’ve never forgotten. Some statistics nostalgia, wonderful turns of phrase and another article that takes a further step towards the complete unpicking of a global scam. Love it.
I tend to click on the like button on the email so that the article opens separately and I can see any changes. I recommend this method to everyone! Yes, because it ratchets up the like count!! "WERGH"? I don't know this term. I will be quoting you again this week!
I gotta try that!
‘Wergh’ first appears in a John Dee Climate Normal article on 5 Sep 2022 entitled 'The Temperature Of The UK Over The Last 100 years (part 2)'. I liked it so much I used it again on 14 Sep 2022 in 'Vaccines & Death (part 9)', then again on 10 Jul 2023 in 'Do COVID Vaccines Work (part 11)' when the phrase ‘the word is wergh’ was born. In any given analysis of pretty much anything these days WTF and WTAF often surface and wergh (often expressed as WERGH!) graciously takes us past the point of raw incredulity into the realm of the truly surreal.
I don't think anything can be said based on the blue line not getting down after vaccines. If it could they wouldn't be doing test-negative studies. What makes more sense to me is this: Look at (symptomatic covid deaths)/(all-cause deaths) both pre and post vaccine. Kind of like a proportional reporting ratio.
I started out crunching the proportion of COVID to all cause death but stopped - I shall recommence turning the handle on this after some tea and toast and shall publish the results in part 7.
Ah the Mann Whitney U Test takes me back. Can’t remember what I was supposed to do with it but it was a cool name I’ve never forgotten. Some statistics nostalgia, wonderful turns of phrase and another article that takes a further step towards the complete unpicking of a global scam. Love it.
Thank you kindly. I have more ideas up my sleeve than I've had hot dinners, and I like hot dinners!